Disdain for the Citizens

     The Board of Selectmen and School District 16 have reached a new low with their demonstration of disdain for the citizens.  They are supporting House Bill (HB) 646, which would allow government agencies to charge for the time it takes to fulfill right-to-know requests that are submitted pursuant to RSA 91A.  The RSA makes it clear that the citizens have a right to information that is not being withheld because it meets confidentiality standards.   RSA 91A provides citizens with easy and affordable access to information held by local and state governments and is a key tool in the protection of citizens from the government.  As the RSA states in its preamble, “Openness in the conduct of public business is essential to a democratic society."
     HB 646 is supported by the New Hampshire Municipal Association and the state’s School Boards Association and the Exeter Board of Selectmen.  Why do these organizations support HB 646 and oppose the citizens right to have access to records?   The answer is simple, they don’t want anyone to oversee their actions and they don’t want to be accountable to the citizens.  The concept of cost recovery is a scheme to make access to public records so expensive that the average citizen will not be able to afford to participate in the process. Once this is achieved, the pesky citizens will go away and they will be able to conduct their business without interference and oversight.  It is important to remind the individuals in these organizations that they are employees of the citizens, and not nobility, and they should be working to help the citizens and not shut them out of the process.

     .

I thought we were supposed to have 5 selectmen?
   
    A funny thing happened last March, we only elected one selectperson, Anne Surman. In place of the fifth selectperson, we got a rubber stamp.
    Have you ever watched the Selectmen's meetings on channel 22? That void sitting next to Chartrand is an inanimate object that does no homework and does not utter an independent, coherent thought.
    Sometimes it seems as though Chartrand has learned ventriloquism and is speaking through the mannequin sitting next to him. Other times, you just hear the sound a rubber stamp makes agreeing with Chartrand.
    It is a shame that this is what the monolith Democrat party has resorted to - elect someone who will just agree with everything their mouthpiece says, regardless of how bad a candidate she might be.
   Have we given over the future of the town to those who don't trust voters and just want to have the Town Manager run the town?  Is Exeter lost?

Left hand, right hand?

 

    Does the left hand know what the right hand is doing?

    We are shooting ourselves in the foot.

    There are so many clichés that seem to apply to our town government.  We hired an Economic Development Director at a cost of about $125,000 per year to bring new or expanded commercial development to town.  The goal is to add non-residential development to help reduce the impact of ever-increasing property taxes.
    The Economic Development Director has been working for months on the Epping Road TIF District, and we are on the verge of voting on it. The expectation is that, by running water and sewer along Epping Road, developers will purchase the commercial property along the road and build multi-million dollar buildings, bringing in scads of tax dollars.
    But wait, while all this is happening, our Town Manager has been negotiating a water supply deal with Stratham that will undermine all the work on the TIF.  How is that, you ask?
    The only impediment to build-out of Stratham’s “Gateway District” is the lack of water and sewer. With Exeter’s water, Gateway District property owners will not be hampered by the septic system setback requirements.  Our water will also supply much needed fire protection water, the single largest impediment to the Market Basket expansion.
     Since Stratham’s property tax rate is less than half of Exeter’s, why would a developer build along Epping Road when they can build in Stratham, have all the water they need and pay significantly less taxes?
     For example, why do you think that Hampton Inn and Fairfield Inn built their motels in Exeter when they could have built them a mile up the road in Stratham and paid far less in taxes? It is because Exeter had what they desperately needed: water and sewer.  If Stratham had even just the water supply, those motels would be sitting north of our town line.
    The proposed $2 million that Stratham would pay to “buy into” our water system is nothing compared to what Exeter will lose in property taxes if developers change their minds about Epping Road and build in Stratham.
    Do our town officials even talk to each other?